Harassment - Geraint Davies former MP and/or Barrister Sarah Branson

Obviously, Mr Arnold James was having difficulty thinking of relevant questions, because the intention of his letter is to further harass the victim of Barrister Miss Sarah Branson and Geraint Davies MP - litigation identities.

1 Pares Land Walk
Rochdale OL16 5SX
12 May 2005

Office of the Social Security and Child Support Commissioners
3rd Floor
Procession House
55 Ludgate Hill
London EC4M 7JW

Sirs

Your incessant bullying
WM 02 86 49 B
Appeals before Commission
CJSA/1165/04, CJSA/1168/04
CJSA/1172/04, CJSA/1167/04, CJSA/1171/04

I refer to Mr Taylor’s letter to me dated 10 May 2005, including a copy of Arnold James, Legal Officer’s letter to me dated 4 April 2005.

Mr Taylor’s enclosure is the first I have seen of Arnold James 4 April 2005 letter. They had the wrong address, please see document number 122 in Mr Taylor’s 10 May 2005 bundle, which explicitly informs the Commission of my address change, in respect of the above numbered appeals.

Mr Taylor’s letter to me dated 10 May 2005, and Mr Arnold James’ letter to me dated 4 April 2005, were intended to harass me, at the same time as litigation brought in the names of Barrister Miss Sarah Branson and Geraint Davies MP in the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court, sitting, perversely, in London’s Royal Courts of Justice.

My ability to breathe is declining markedly, and is obviously reduced during the day, in addition to my decades old nocturnal breathing problems. My submissions to the Commissioner will, therefore, be increasingly amateur, but I will do my best, if asked, and given a chance to do so.

The best chance to respond is to ensure legally qualified assistance is available to me. I do, therefore, ask that the Commissioner directs that, subject to the availability of funding, legal assistance is made available to me.

Page 2 of 3

Statements by Mr James, and others, that this falls outside the gift of the Commissioner are rubbish. The primary objective of all officers of the English judiciary, including the Commissioner, and Mr James, is justice.

This is not "justice within the law," whatever that might be, but justice. In my case, justice means making legal services available to me.

Was the Commissioner aware of Arnold James letter to me dated 4 April 2005?
Does the Commissioner want me to answer the questions in Arnold James letter to me of 4 April 2005?
I have a stack of evidence proving Claims from August to October 2003. The Secretary of State broke my claims by lying - lying - in order to give the local authority an excuse for declining my Rent and Council Tax Rebate Claims. Does the Commissioner want to see this, because it is highly relevant?
The Commission has inflicted a three month gap and Mr L Taylor deliberately sent my copy of his revised bundle to an address other than the one I gave in the first document in his revised bundle. This is number 106, my letter of 30 September 2004. If the Commission now intends to reach a proper determinations of my appeals, then may I have an opportunity to submit appeals due when the Commission was disregarding my appeals?
In what way did my letter of 19 March 2005, clearly addressed to The Manager of Rochdale Job Centre, and not mentioning any extant appeals, let alone one before the Commissioner, confuse Mr James?
Would Mr Arnold James and Mr L Taylor please refrain from harassment?
Would Mr Arnold James please note that he should arrest those asking and instructing him to harass me, and he would arrest them, if he had any courage?
Would you please bring this correspondence to the attention of the Commissioner?

Yours faithfully

T Moore

Page 3 of 3

1 Pares Land Walk
Rochdale OL16 5SX
17 May 2005

Office of the Social Security and Child Support Commissioners
3rd Floor
Procession House
55 Ludgate Hill
London EC4M 7JW

Sirs

Your incessant criminal harassment
WM 02 86 49 B
Appeals before Commission
CJSA/1165/04, CJSA/1168/04
CJSA/1172/04, CJSA/1167/04, CJSA/1171/04

May I please have a reply to my letter of 12 May 2005 (copy attached)? Are you concealing your criminal activities from the Commissioner?

Yours faithfully

T Moore

Page 1 of 3


	Before believing this crap, read the penultimate question
	In response to a letter dated 4 April 2005, what do you think I might have to say? Obviously, Mr Arnold James was having difficulty thinking of relevant questions, because the intention of his letter is to further harass the victim of Barrister Miss Sarah Branson and Geraint Davies MP - litigation identities. As you might expect, I did not receive the letter for over a month. 1 Pares Land Walk Rochdale OL16 5SX 12 May 2005 Office of the Social Security and Child Support Commissioners 3rd Floor Procession House 55 Ludgate Hill London EC4M 7JW Sirs Your incessant bullying WM 02 86 49 B Appeals before Commission CJSA/1165/04, CJSA/1168/04 CJSA/1172/04, CJSA/1167/04, CJSA/1171/04 I refer to Mr Taylor’s letter to me dated 10 May 2005, including a copy of Arnold James, Legal Officer’s letter to me dated 4 April 2005. Mr Taylor’s enclosure is the first I have seen of Arnold James 4 April 2005 letter. They had the wrong address, please see document number 122 in Mr Taylor’s 10 May 2005 bundle, which explicitly informs the Commission of my address change, in respect of the above numbered appeals. Mr Taylor’s letter to me dated 10 May 2005, and Mr Arnold James’ letter to me dated 4 April 2005, were intended to harass me, at the same time as litigation brought in the names of Barrister Miss Sarah Branson and Geraint Davies MP in the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court, sitting, perversely, in London’s Royal Courts of Justice. My ability to breathe is declining markedly, and is obviously reduced during the day, in addition to my decades old nocturnal breathing problems. My submissions to the Commissioner will, therefore, be increasingly amateur, but I will do my best, if asked, and given a chance to do so. The best chance to respond is to ensure legally qualified assistance is available to me. I do, therefore, ask that the Commissioner directs that, subject to the availability of funding, legal assistance is made available to me. Page 2 of 3 Statements by Mr James, and others, that this falls outside the gift of the Commissioner are rubbish. The primary objective of all officers of the English judiciary, including the Commissioner, and Mr James, is justice. This is not "justice within the law," whatever that might be, but justice. In my case, justice means making legal services available to me. Was the Commissioner aware of Arnold James letter to me dated 4 April 2005? Does the Commissioner want me to answer the questions in Arnold James letter to me of 4 April 2005? I have a stack of evidence proving Claims from August to October 2003. The Secretary of State broke my claims by lying - lying - in order to give the local authority an excuse for declining my Rent and Council Tax Rebate Claims. Does the Commissioner want to see this, because it is highly relevant? The Commission has inflicted a three month gap and Mr L Taylor deliberately sent my copy of his revised bundle to an address other than the one I gave in the first document in his revised bundle. This is number 106, my letter of 30 September 2004. If the Commission now intends to reach a proper determinations of my appeals, then may I have an opportunity to submit appeals due when the Commission was disregarding my appeals? In what way did my letter of 19 March 2005, clearly addressed to The Manager of Rochdale Job Centre, and not mentioning any extant appeals, let alone one before the Commissioner, confuse Mr James? Would Mr Arnold James and Mr L Taylor please refrain from harassment? Would Mr Arnold James please note that he should arrest those asking and instructing him to harass me, and he would arrest them, if he had any courage? Would you please bring this correspondence to the attention of the Commissioner? Yours faithfully T Moore Page 3 of 3 1 Pares Land Walk Rochdale OL16 5SX 17 May 2005 Office of the Social Security and Child Support Commissioners 3rd Floor Procession House 55 Ludgate Hill London EC4M 7JW Sirs Your incessant criminal harassment WM 02 86 49 B Appeals before Commission CJSA/1165/04, CJSA/1168/04 CJSA/1172/04, CJSA/1167/04, CJSA/1171/04 May I please have a reply to my letter of 12 May 2005 (copy attached)? Are you concealing your criminal activities from the Commissioner? Yours faithfully T Moore Page 1 of 3