Sewer litigant Barrister Miss Sarah Branson deliberately served this Order with the wrong form. This does not give me time to apply to the Court for the proper Notice of Hearing dated 21 June 2005. This is obviously not a mistake, for if dishonest service were not the intention of Barrister Miss Sarah Branson, she would have served the documents with due speed, as the rules require, on or about 21 June 2005. "A copy of the application notice must be served as soon as practicable after it is filed" [Civil Procedure Rule 23.7 (1) (a)].

Were Sarah Branson honest, Sarah Branson would not have waited until the last minute, and then complained - presumably because I have not seen that affidavit either - about the security measures her service provider Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council forced me to take.