Letter to Miles and Partners solicitors

1 Pares Land Walk
Rochdale OL16 5SX
27 September 2005

Miles and Partners
Correct address not known
London


Sirs

I refer to your letter dated 26 September 2005 (copy attached).

I do not have the time to deal with your letter in full, because I am trying to file other documents with the Court, and you and your Clients are refusing to lift the ban on my access to legal services.

Are you diverting me from filing my papers with the Appeal Court? I notice this is the second item of litigation your side has issued against me this month.

You web site monitors attended my home this morning, wrecked a padlock of mine, and replaced it with a larger padlock at public expense, and gave me two of its three keys. Are you going to excuse this disgusting behaviour by claiming Miss Sarah Branson was unaware of its details, without mentioning the other parties for whom you are working?

Please note, again, I did not say your clients are responsible for placing the ban on my access to legal services in the first place. I asked them, and you, to lift that ban, and so far you have all refused.

Since you refuse to answer my letters properly, and in most cases you have not replied at all, I have been unable to secure from you, in view of the conflicting information you supplied, your correct address. Therefore, I will send this letter to other solicitors who will, I hope, pass it on to you.

I notice that of the three domains about which you complain, that on the day you wrote your letter, 26 September 2005, and the days leading up to 26 September 2005, www.tom-moore.co.uk was and is owned by I T Databases Limited, 52 Thames Street, Lower Sunbury, Middlesex TW16 6AF, and www.sarahbranson.info did not and does not exist.

May I ask you, please, to restrict your allegations to claims your clients believe to be true? None of them are stupid, and all of them can use the Internet with proficiency.

You have repeatedly refused to lift the ban on my access to legal services, you claim a provider of legal services is somehow available, but you will not identify him or her for me. You then persuade the High Court to make findings of fact that your clients know to be completely untrue. Since you know I cannot defend myself in the High Court, or any other Court, and that I have a good case, would you please refrain from bullying me in this way?

I ask that if anyone who reads this letter knows of a source of qualified legal help, that is able, willing and allowed to represent me, wherever that source may be, that they inform me of his or her name and work contact details, as soon as possible.

I will try to deal with the remainder of your letter, when I have the time, if you reply to this letter properly, and you ask. To date, Miles & Partners have not replied to any of my letters properly, in most cases not at all, leaving me to wonder if any of my letters were ever received in readable form.

Should you not reply to this letter, properly, within two months, I will take that to mean you have, on behalf of your clients, abandoned all claims against me. Please understand that it will take me a very long time, to deal with allegations you do not believe, should I continue to be, as I have been to date, unable to obtain proper replies from Miles and Partners.

I note that Miss Sarah Branson became so satiated with the quality of your service, that she took upon herself the task of filing documents with the Court, and sending them to your thug Christine Greenwood. I have no idea why your Miss Sarah Branson sought the injunction forbidding me from questioning her ability to exercise her profession, as she is obviously a very well educated, experienced and capable barrister.

May I please remind you, and your clients, that monitoring me, and any web sites you believe I may own, even if I do not, is a criminal offence, contrary to the Protection from Harassment Act 1997? The first time I was aware that Miss Sarah Branson had taken control of this claim from you, was upon you claiming your clients had nothing to do with the web site monitor your clients appointed.

You made that claim in your letter dated 30 March 2005, and it subsequently was proven that your clients had already appointed Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council to monitor at least one of the web sites about which you complain, and Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council appointed Zen Internet to monitor the web site you call www.sarahbranson.com on their behalf.

May I also, please, point out that at 4.32 pm on 26 September 2005, Miss Sarah Branson was downloading materials from the web site you call www.sarahbranson.com, contrary to the terms and conditions for use of that site? Would you please ensure she stops?

Yours faithfully


T Moore