|
Affidavit |
|
 Page |
|
|
|
Affidavit |
|
Page |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
1 Pares Land Walk
represented by solicitors Mills & Partners v Moore Are you aware that someone on your side also arranged for the Social Security Commission to raise a detailed enquiry with me, on 4 April 2005? The copy letter I have has the wrong address for me. Would you agree to have all determinations against me set aside, in the light of this additional evidence of harassment by your side? The Commission decided not to determine my appeals, and the excuse for sending that letter, is weak. I ask you, in the light, amongst other things, of this additional harassment to which your side is subjecting me, to disown your side, and help me. I would do my best to get you proper remuneration as soon as practicable. I wonder if you would consider forming an opinion that these tactics are too far beneath you, and that the competence of these solicitors is less than you imagined? I have no particular desire to meet you, and hope any help you could arrange, would be via a third party, or communicating without having to speak to each other. May I please point out that I am offended by bogus allegations of actual, intentional and potential violence? As far as I am aware, we did not meet at Court. Is this a mistake on either side? I attach a copy of my letter to Geraint of 3 May 2005. It explains the need to write to you as direct as I can. I should also mention that, as far as I know, Mr Geraint Davies has not replied to my 3 May 2005 letter (attached). Yours sincerely 
T Moore Page 1 of 3
1 Pares Land Walk Geraint Davies MP 23 Coombe Road Croydon CR0 1BD Geraint Mills & Partners v Moore I need to reply to a letter I received from your chosen solicitors Mills & Partners, which I received on Saturday, 30 April 2005. Acting on your instructions, as they must be, solicitors Mills & Partners are refusing to answer any questions from me at all. Would you please revoke your instructions not to answer any of my questions at all for any reason, so Mills & Partners will then be able to answer the question in my letter of 29 March 2005, about the fax number I should use for correspondence with Mills & Partners. Would you also revoke the instruction ordering the Courts never to reply to my letters properly? May I also ask that you revoke your instruction to solicitors Mills & Partners, the Court and your site monitors, to put false dates on their nasty letters to me? The date on the Mills & Partners letter I received on Saturday 30 April 2005 was 30 March 2005. The date on the Court’s letter to me of 27 April 2005, was 22 April 2005. The date on your web site monitors’ letter to me of 19 April 2005, was 14 April 2005. That letter was precipitated by my writing to them about people smashing my windows on your instructions. Now that both you and Sarah Branson have seen on the web site - http://www.sarahbranson.com - a description of how you are killing me, would you consider ending this horrid policy, and allowing me the mechanical breathing aids I need? Could you check the severity of the illness described on that web site, note that it always deteriorates with age, and consider whether Sarah and you want to be responsible for this blatantly inhumane litigation? Sarah and you could suspend the litigation, while restoring my access to services, especially the mechanical breathing aids I need, and my access to legal services. Would you please revoke the demands for telephone calls? On my defence form, I asked for no more telephone calls. On 30 April 2005 I received a demand for a telephone call from your solicitors, Mills & Partners, acting on your instructions, as they must be. Page 2 of 3
Your second bogus newspaper enquiry, on 5 April 2005, from the “hurrah for the black shirts” Mail on Sunday, also a demanded for a telephone call. Dragging your own name through the sewer with Associated Newspapers, is good reason to question whether you are instructing Mills & Partners. Did you instruct Mills & Partners that you felt harassed by the statement, as, “Richard Ottaway, the Croydon South Conservative MP, was more helpful, insisting that Broomleigh Housing Association tell me where they had hidden my breathing ventilator machine. Richard Ottaway is a solicitor, but Sarah Branson is a barrister?” Mills and Partners told me you instructed them that statement does somehow harass you. Someone instructed Mills & Partners to write to me claiming you live with Barrister Miss Sarah Branson BA. Was it you? I still have no idea why I am being harassed on behalf of Broomleigh Housing Association. Your side blocked my access to employment and employment services, presumably to increase my suffering and hasten my death. Is there a plan, having made me homeless, to use me as an excuse for excessive legislation, as was done to Michael Stone? Geraint Davies overwrote the legitimate diagnoses by Dr Adrian Williams of my severe structural breathing difficulties, with his own, of mental disorder. Does your side have someone qualified to tell that lie? Was a plan of that sort developed to create a more workable case for the Michael Stone legislation, which is unique to this country? You did it more successfully to Barry George with the Protection from Harassment Act, so you could easily do it to me. Everyone I ask for help, either refuses, or banned from having anything to do with me, by some coward in charge. I am not sufficiently important to merit the attention to which you and others are subjecting me, but something must motivate the harassment campaign, now over eleven years old. Please do not kill anyone, at all. Yours sincerely
T Moore Page 3 of 3
|
|
Affidavit |
|
Page |
|
Page |
